Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

GATWICK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Feb 2013, 11:06
  #1441 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,625
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
From Travel Mole:

Wow air is more than doubling its flights from London Gatwick to Reykjavik from June 2.

It will increase services from six times a week to 13 times a week.

Twice-daily flights will depart London at 12:15 and 20:40 on Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday with a daily flight on Saturday, departing at 12:15.

The airline will be increasing its fleet of Airbus A320s and introducing two new aircraft from next month.
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 22:38
  #1442 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,625
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Gatwick closed tonight - 9 flights diverted (EZY & TOM).

Reason, anyone?
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2013, 11:35
  #1443 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,625
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Gatwick outlines plans for 'radical' changes

Gatwick introducing real competition into the London market. This could adversely affect MAG's plans for STN.
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2013, 15:00
  #1444 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Radical Change No.1 ?

Only 15 minutes away ?

Rename Gatwick airport Croydon International, urges politician (From Croydon Guardian)

What planet are some of these guys on ?
sanjaime is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2013, 20:41
  #1445 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middlesex (under the flightpath)
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Radical Change No.1 ?

Quote: "Only 15 minutes away ?

Rename Gatwick airport Croydon International, urges politician (From Croydon Guardian)

What planet are some of these guys on ?"

It's April 1st, doesn't time fly!

It gets worse, my local airport is being renamed "Hounslow (Dick Turpin) International Airport" (IATA code HDT).

Stupid b*****ds!
Fairdealfrank is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2013, 23:34
  #1446 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Doncaster
Age: 63
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dick Turpin was born in Essex, so that would be a better name for Southend or Boris Island. Famous residents of Hounslow you could name your airport after are Russell Grant or Phil Collins.

If you want to rename Gatwick, famous residents of Crawley are Alan Minter (a boxer, for younger readers), Gareth Southgate (footballer) and John George Haigh (acid bath killer).

At least you won't have to name your local airport after a fictional character.

Last edited by johnnychips; 14th Feb 2013 at 23:40.
johnnychips is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 04:48
  #1447 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North East
Age: 37
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know when somebody's 'flying the idea up the flagpole' that its got to be a joke.

Give him a break, he's just doing some blue sky thinking outside the box...
jerboy is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 11:56
  #1448 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southampton
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Iraqi Airways

Finally Iraqi Airways have officially announced there much anticipated flights from Baghad to London Gatwick.

Flights will commence on the 5th March 2013 with two direct flights from LGW to Baghdad and one to Sulaimaniya every week with the frequency increasing to 6 flights a week by 15th June 2013, flights will be operated by their brand new Airbus 330.

As per Iraqi Airways homepage

BGW-LGW; Tue, Thu - 13.00-20.00
ISU-LGW; Fri - 13.00-20.00

LGW-BGW; Tue, Thur - 22.00-06.30
LGW-ISU; Fri - 22.00-06.30



Good to see another new airline at LGW.

Last edited by canberra97; 15th Feb 2013 at 11:58.
canberra97 is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 12:45
  #1449 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Gatwick
Posts: 479
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for that ...great news
Charley B is online now  
Old 15th Feb 2013, 13:18
  #1450 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southampton, U.K
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good to see Iraqi finally start a 'proper' service, hopefully it will last!
adfly is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2013, 17:33
  #1451 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middlesex (under the flightpath)
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote: "Dick Turpin was born in Essex, so that would be a better name for Southend or Boris Island. Famous residents of Hounslow you could name your airport after are Russell Grant or Phil Collins."

BTW Dick Turpin tranacted much of his "business" on what is now Heathrow: the notorious (at that time) Hounslow Heath.

It is no co-incidence that there is a street called "Dick Turpin Way" at Hatton Cross, just off the airport, and a transport cafe (now long gone of course) of the same name on the A30.

Last edited by Fairdealfrank; 18th Feb 2013 at 17:33. Reason: spelling
Fairdealfrank is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2013, 12:55
  #1452 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
BA are taking the fight at Gatwick to the LCCs by launching new fares that do not include checked bags in return for saving about £10 each way. Good to see BA not letting the orange brigade trample over them.

I notice however that on the Jersey route it makes Flybe less competitive, particularly if BA can beat them on both airfare and frequency. Given the landing fees very much favour larger aircraft, how long can Flybe sustain the Jersey route at Gatwick ?

Last edited by davidjohnson6; 19th Feb 2013 at 12:56.
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2013, 14:38
  #1453 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: cornwall, uk
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BE are loosing out at LGW big time,

As much as i would like to see BE go from the JER-LGW route would that not surely bring EZY onto the route ?

Regardless, due to the demand BA would have to add capacity ot introduce a JER-LCY/LHR rotation or two ?
cornishsimon is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2013, 17:37
  #1454 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA need to raise their game at LGW to stay with the LoCo's. Norwegian are already the 3rd largest airline in terms of pax number behind BA & Easyjet and well ahead of FR.

NAS go to 4 x daily to OSL from 1st April with early departures each way, although only 3 airframes will night stop to start the new base, in and back out aircraft will ramp up flight numbers rapidly, coming from LPA,AGP,TFS & ALC
LNIDA is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2013, 18:22
  #1455 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Norwegian may well be this years Aer Lingus, they have as much brand recognition in the markets they're entering. btw Norwegian's codes are DY or NAX.....

What do you mean raise their game? They have Avios, lounge access and free drink and snack. Older B734s are being replaced by newer A319s. It's not a bad product to take to market.

People will choose Thomson, Monarch, easyJet or BA before Norwegian even crosses their mind. I have yet to see any form of advertising for this new venture at the London end.

Last edited by Skipness One Echo; 19th Feb 2013 at 18:24.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2013, 19:31
  #1456 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LV
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Norwegian Air Shuttle has always been abbreviated to NAS. Im sure it wasn't suppose to represent an IATA/ICAO code
CabinCrewe is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2013, 21:21
  #1457 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Skipness

NAS have already a solid 8% of the LGW traffic, without doubt NAS challenge is to get people to try them on new routes, the product is very good and people will come back LGW traffic has a huge amount of repeat business and load factors on many of their routes is already high

Last edited by LNIDA; 19th Feb 2013 at 21:21.
LNIDA is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2013, 21:48
  #1458 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
LNIDA - I think the point Skipness is trying to make is that while Norwegian may have excellent brand recognition by people is SE England fo travel to Scandinavia, in the same way that Aer Lingus are well known for flying to Ireland, neither Aer Lingus in 2009 nor Norwegian in 2013 are widely known by the general public for flying from Gatwick to the Med or Canaries. Aer Lingus did at least make a good try at publicising the fact, running ads on TV and large outdoor poster ads and in newspapers. I have seen very little advertising telling the public masses that Norwegian flies from Gatwick to Barcelona or Rome. The likely impact is slow bookings - either seats fly empty or are sold at firesale prices.

Norwegian have added a lot of capacity on non Scandi routes at Gatwick. The flights to Oslo should sell well, but when Joe Bloggs books to go to Malaga it's Easyjet or Monarch that pops into his head. Norwegian just doesn't get a look-in.
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2013, 21:52
  #1459 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aer Lingus brought nothing new to the market, NAS have free Wifi, free cartoons & movies on board, sky interior means big bins, and allocated seating, a website that is transparent in a way only legacy carriers come close to & you can through book to destinations that require a stop at OSL/CPH/ARN/HEL so if you need to get some where obscure that's of the normal radar you can and it all adds volume.

Brand awareness is of course low, but the days of billboard and TV advertising are over, any route search out of London brings up Norwegian banner adds & you can't miss the aircraft with DCR nose can you?

On time performance is way above either BA or Monarch and NAS cost base is much lower than either.

I think we can all agree that brand awareness is the challenge and they are not adding massive of capacity to the med routes, but the world is changing there are an awful lot of English on the Nordic routes and the product is well known in LPA & TFS

I have flown with MON EZY & BA out LGW in the past 6 months, EZY are the best for on time, but it can be a scrum,BA have suffered with poor staff attitude on the ground due to contracting out and Monarch well where do you start? They still operate like a charter airline and what's a few hours delay between friends

Last edited by LNIDA; 19th Feb 2013 at 22:09.
LNIDA is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2013, 05:42
  #1460 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cornishsimon
Why would you want to see Flybe off the Jersey route? On what evidence do you say they are losing out bigtime at Gatwick? They have adjusted their network there and seem to be holding their own against EI.
Flybe provide useful competition with BA on the Jersey route. Always good to have a choice.
Maybe your dislike has more to do with never forgiving them for taking on the London-Newquay route!!
Your obsession with wanting airlines, and I guess in your view it would have to be BA, to fly from all over the world to Newquay may be clouding your judgement.

V.
vectisman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.