Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > African Aviation
Reload this Page >

DL upgrades ATL-JNB to B777-200LR

Wikiposts
Search
African Aviation Regional issues that affect the numerous pilots who work in this area of the world.

DL upgrades ATL-JNB to B777-200LR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Nov 2008, 13:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Age: 51
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up DL upgrades ATL-JNB to B777-200LR

According to a Delta press release yesterday, DL will fly their new B777LR nonstop to JNB and nonstop back to ATL. Surely the return would be pushing the bird to the max?

They also added numerous flights to other parts of Africa. Nice to see an American carrier finally making an effort to serve the Dark Continent.
Press release can be seen at Delta to Offer Customers Service to More Unique International Destinations in 2009elta Newsroom

Last edited by AT502B; 13th Nov 2008 at 13:55. Reason: link
AT502B is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2008, 14:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think they will struggle to get the 777-200LR JNB-ATL with a decent payload (with any payload). I can foresee them making unscheduled stops in Dakar (or even Sal or maybe even Cape Town) relatively regularly!

Interesting that they are moving the CPT flight to ATL and reducing the frequency to three times a week (from four) - it is still a net gain in capacity! I think ATL gives them better connectivity in the US and since the JNB flight is no longer stopping in DKR they do not need to have the connecting option there!
evanb is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2008, 14:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JNB-ATL: 8439 mi - would be the world's fifth longest non-stop by distance, not a chance out of JNB no matter what aircraft! Even with a weight restriction this is going to be too much!
evanb is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2008, 15:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: It wasn't me, I wasn't there, wrong country ;-)
Age: 79
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe WDH, at least it's got the length.
merlinxx is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2008, 17:35
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its not the length that is the problem! Its the tire speed restrictions at hot and high and WDH might have some problems there (not very high, but very hot)! If they choose a tech stop they are going to go somewhere where they have a presence, hence Sal or Dakar, even Lagos!
evanb is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2008, 07:07
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pretoria
Age: 52
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think maybe, just maybe, Delta had a look at this before making the decision. Considering they operate hundreds of aircraft and have done so for decades, the point of departure that they are too thick to understand the limitations may be neither fair nor valid.

If not keep an eye on your PM box 'cause I'm sure they will be sending an offer through shortly.
WhinerLiner is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2008, 07:36
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: George, South Africa
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it is still a net gain in capacity

Is it really, somewhere on Airliners.net someone mentioned that Delta's 77L has 9 seats less than the 767-400ER that DL currently use to JNB.
grjplanes is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2008, 11:32
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, but not stopping in Dakar provides more seats for sale from Joburg hence the net increase in capacity. Atlanta to Dakar will still remain daily since Cape Town will remain 3 days per week and Atlanta to Nairobi (via Dakar) 4 days per week!
evanb is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2008, 11:36
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A post from another forum. The author of the post works for Emirates, the only airline who has actually used a 777-200 LR from Joburg, so they have some idea about the performance of the aircraft from the field. The post is pretty convincing that Delta are going to struggle, either by having to stop or taking a massive penalty!

Delta will be starting to operate JNB-ATL direct from next year sometime.
The Delta res system says 02 Jun Dep JNB 2105 arr ATL 0720.

I don't see Delta operating this route direct from JNB due to high restrictions on take off due to the high elevation
of JNB and possible high temperatures during the summer even with Delta departing 2 hours later and a lower
temperature then, they will still face some problems.

Just did a few performance calculations based on another carrier using the B777-200LR.

Based on today's wind calculations and take off data for JNB.
Rwy03L (Best Rwy)
Flying time 16H20
Fuel Burn 121400kgs
Sector Fuel 130800kgs
RTOW 324000kgs (MTOW 343300kgs) Including Packs off, Alternate CG, Thrust bump
Wind 360/04kt , Temp 19 , Q1018

Based on a RTOW of 324000kgs the RZFW will be 193900kgs (MZFW 209100kgs)
This means with a RTOW witch results in a RZFW the B777-200LR will be loosing
15200kgs of payload.

I also understand that the winds change everyday and u might get more payload everyday, but the fact remains they will not get MTOW out of JNB even at a temperature of 0.
RTOW at 0c is 330000kgs.
evanb is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2016, 18:37
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 90
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even with a RZFW of 193900kg, with a DOW of ~163700kg payload will be about 30t which is ~ max passenger (281*110kg incl bags). At an average 85% passenger load fa ctor there would be weight available for some cargo.
moutere101 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2016, 07:51
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Benoni, ZA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is great that this thread has resurfaced. Possibility for good discussion!

@moutere101, I hear also that the yields are good on this flight.

What would the per hour fuel burn be for this flight? Based on the numbers from evanb i get a figure of between 7500kg to 8000kg.

Last edited by MoKa777; 17th Oct 2016 at 07:51. Reason: Spelling
MoKa777 is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2016, 05:37
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: africa
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have used this service for the last 6 years. Flight is always full and never had an issue. Well done to Delta.... As you go into Atlanta a Delta hub you can get almost anywhere in the US without going to another hub first. Try any of the other airlines and see...
hatman is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2016, 04:37
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
hatman, trivial pursuit here, have you ever timed that take off roll ?


I imagine it's longish.
stilton is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.