Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

Ryanair accident at Ciampino

Wikiposts
Search
Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Ryanair accident at Ciampino

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Mar 2017, 11:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 778
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ryanair accident at Ciampino

Does anyone know if a formal report by the Italian authorities has been completed and published for this serious aircraft incident which resulted in a writeoff? A considerable number of years have passed and the conclusions would be interesting to read.

Last edited by Meikleour; 19th Mar 2017 at 13:41. Reason: poor grammer
Meikleour is online now  
Old 18th Mar 2017, 22:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm intrigued at the possible differences between a "serious aircraft writeoff" (sic) and a lighthearted one.

Additionally, how is one writeoff more or less "serious" than another?

Aren't all writeoffs "serious", by definition?
noflynomore is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 12:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which one? The roll-back in 2014 or the bird strike in 2008?

PM
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 19:55
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever someone will pay me to do fun stuff
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by noflynomore
I'm intrigued at the possible differences between a "serious aircraft writeoff" (sic) and a lighthearted one.
Not quite what was proposed. I'm more inclined to imagine that the poster was seeking to make clear that it was classified as a serious incident and thus falls withing the scope of ICAO Annex 13 and EU reg 996/2010.

Whilst I suspect that Meikleour already knows this, the ANSV website refers to the event, and mentions that the results of the investigation are expected to be of international interest, but there appears to have been nothing further published.
LookingForAJob is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2017, 16:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There has been a cast in German TV 2 days ago, dealing about FR and itīs illegal practices throughout all Europe - Profit. Auf Kosten aller? ? Der gnadenlose Preiskampf der Billigairlines | Video zu Reportage & Dokumentation | Das Erste Mediathek. Itīs in German.
The event in CIA was mentioned as well as those in MAD/VLC (low fuel).
Obviously the TV journalists were citing from this report of the CIA event, were it sayīs, that the Captain should have better called in sick, as he lost his son a few days earlier, thus being completely traumatized.
skycruiser65 is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2017, 21:37
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 778
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
skycruiser65: That was a different FR incident which was a diversion from Ciampino - the incident I am looking for is the multiple bird strike followed by a very hard landing at Ciampino.
Meikleour is online now  
Old 23rd Mar 2017, 00:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure the birdstrike one has been released. But to call that a hard landing doesn't fully acknowledge the crew's input. It was either that or a crash elsewhere. As some might say: "The boys done well". I shall have to have a poke about.

PM
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2017, 16:22
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 893
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
The bird strike report has never been released. The story when I was based down at Ciampino was that there were local political reasons for burying it and it would never see the light of day.

Ryanair I believe have all the FDR and CVR data and have drawn their own internal conclusions but...
Jwscud is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2017, 09:14
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 778
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jwscud: Interesting...... however it is difficult to see how this report could be "buried" when there were significant other parties involved eg. Boeing and SNECMA whose reputations are also involved. Italian burcreascracy however is well known to be slow and ponderous. ICAO protocols would be difficult to avoid surely?
My own interest stems from a similar incident a few years earlier at Fiumicino. Same time of year when the usual bird migrations take place. During a take-off in an A340 we ingested 12 birds into two of the engines. Both engines suffered N1 fan damage but continued to deliver thrust, albeit somewhat reduced, which enabled a return landing to an overweight landing. For comparison, a normal landing uses ~ 50%N1 and we needed ~80%N1 Tough old engines which continued to run.
Meikleour is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.