Yes it does. Drag the aeroplane symbol along and you'll see that that approach was nothing like 3.15° from 3000ft as you stated in your earlier post with the implication there was nothing wrong with it. It is clear that the first approach was above and then ducked down below the path of the second approach. Perhaps you are not a pilot. Gyrations in sink rate including 1200fpm at 300ft is not normal. If you discredit that info, then your claim of 3.15° from 3000ft is also discredited.
As for
Yours is the poor/misleading interpretation
That's why I stated "Rider...".
