PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - NAT HF Phraseology
View Single Post
Old 1st Aug 2016, 05:57
  #8 (permalink)  
Smithy02
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My view, is that a SELCAL check (like many other checks) gives absolutely no assurance it will work any time in future. With HF there are a myriad of reasons why a test at (say) 60W will not guarantee success at 40W - weather, HF conditions, sunspots, direction of flight etc etc. No question we must monitor the appropriate freqs but we should do what is done downunder and omit specific SELCAL checks. You could possibly make a case for one, but doing two or three per crossing is nonsense.
Smithy02 is offline