Who pays this Commissioner?
If it is on a CAsA remit, as I suspect it is, how is the position "independent" and why must one pass this hurdle before they have any access to The Commonwealth Ombudsman, who I'm told, must be satisfied that all other avenues of redress have been exhausted.
How convenient for CAsA.
While the new CAsA Chairman is having a purge, can I suggest this position is unfairly impacting on complainant's who get stonewalled at this point and impacts upon their ability to remain taxpayers of this Country.
Would this not be in accord with The Prime Ministers edict to remove "red and green tape", or in this case "blue tape"?