PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Merged: CASA Regulatory Reform
View Single Post
Old 19th Mar 2013, 18:40
  #107 (permalink)  
halfmanhalfbiscuit
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Age: 53
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The big mistake was having half based on FAR's and half based on EASA regulations. EASA and FAA probably advised use one or the other we don't care which one. It now looks like there is going to be middle reg's to join the mismatches.

Is it true that maintenance reg's were not going to accept APMA, which is a fundamental part of Part 21?
halfmanhalfbiscuit is offline