This thread is becoming more 'Alice in Wonderland' with every post.
Originally Posted by Lyka
I still struggle with the fact that based on the information and supportive evidence these crew had (TAF's, NOTAMS etc), the crew felt they couldn't make a reasoned argument to their management for taking EXTRA fuel (I.e., more than OFP+300). The fact that the TAF may have said PROB40 TEMPO etc doesn't mean there isn't a risk of deviation from the OFP assumtions that needs to be mitigated in some way (change of ALTN, extra fuel etc).
- now you are saying you didn't say that? Which '
AF prob40 TEMPO' are you on about then?
Was that a white rabbit I just saw?