Originally Posted by AZR
the AAIB agrees with the general scenario
Based strictly on what they have been given to examine.
But as they were "severely restricted" in their access to the evidences ...
(*) It is my belief that improvments regarding transparency was notable since then (e.g. AF447). Kudos on that point: lesson was learned.
So transparent that the Judge withold data from the proceedings.
Transparency is the best cure against skepticism.
Where is it then ... ?