CP you have the right to comment …
That’s very generous of you. Thanks.
The beauty part is that within the hallowed halls of the tribunal lies the solution. Proof positive in lovely, publicly available transcript; all the porkpies, half truths, misdirection, misleading etc. etc. All there; and, the best part – it's all said under oath (which is Criminal). It's all too easy when you think it through.
Just get down and dirty, do some reading and expose the misleading, lying monkeys for what they are. They all sign oaths at the end of a statement, prove the statement to be a fib and Bingo; you win a chocolate frog on the bag a bad man stand. It's actually like shooting fish in a barrel, once you get the hang of it. A signed confession (or two) in every statement. .
Send your proof off to a decent Polly near you and worry the crap out of them. THEY SHOULD BE WORRIED – a lot more than they appear to be.
Make sure you post a copy of the damning material here, too. It’s apparently too easy (when you think it through), so we should soon see a veritable tsunami of identified “porkpies, half truths, misdirection, misleading etc. etc”. Standing by …
And I’m still waiting for someone to identify a matter in which counsel for CASA was a QC. Remember: “Proof positive in lovely, publicly available transcript.” It’s all public record …