LeadSled, “I think you will find that what he means is: If you read the relevant aircraft AFM, and CAR 138, and CAO 40.1 (and the CAAP in asymmetric training) and "between the lines" of the transcript, Butson was invited by said FOI to conduct training contrary to the requirements or recommendations of all of the above, in a manner that Butson (and any other sane person) would say constituted as an unacceptable risk”,
that doesn’t answer my question – my question is and I will try and spell it out loud and clear for you (and Kharon), WHAT EXACTLY DID THE FOI DEMAND OF POLAR AS FAR AS MULTI-ENGINE TRAINING IS CONCERNED? Simply making vague statements quoting flight manuals, CAR 138, a CAAP and an even vaguer statement of “reading between the lines” doesn’t answer my question...
I'm still waiting for your answer too Kharon....
VH-MLE
ps I also agree with Creampuff that CASA is well past its use by date and in need of major overhaul, but that has or had absolutely no bearing at all on the Polar matter in my view.