Reformed or reformatted?
The latest blurb, issued by 'he who must not be named' worries me more than any of the previous scripts provided from Yes Minister; it shows a new strategy.
Just have a read of some of the current rubbish on offer, talk to the engineers (those that have stayed in business) then decide. It will do no good to whinge and whine after this mess becomes law; and, by the sounds of it, there is a whole load of 'new' law heading your way. There is a little time before the next election.
So far the 'new' regulations have provided a garbled mix of CAO and CAR loaded in favour of the regulator, larded with Draconian threats and seasoned with complex language. The next step will be to dump a load of unworkable rubbish into the industry lap and say – 'there you go boys, new regs'. Then it becomes the industry problem, not theirs. Yes Minister, we delivered, not our fault the industry can't work them. We consulted, we redrafted and we provided.
Have the regulations been reformed and remodelled in compliance with ICAO and the rest of the world? or have we just been handed a stew of the same of old crap, reformatted to suit.
Last edited by Kharon; 25th Jul 2012 at 20:29.