atakacs wrote:
Whoops that's pretty short notice... seems some one is playing poker.
Cargolux is not playing poker. Anyone who knows CV, anyone who knows their historical loyalty to Boeing and their need for an aircraft that delivers the performance that Boeing promised for the -8F if they are to survive and prosper in competition with B777F operators, will realize that this must be a very serious issue indeed.
OEW above target + SFC above target = range/payload shortfall that CV cannot live with - end of story.
Clearly the guys in Seattle have still not convinced CV that they have in place a strategy that will put the unit costs of this aircraft where they need to be.