HazelNuts39,
Thanks for the references from the BEA report, I didn't remember them.
Still, I think the AD is more specific :
However, in some cases, the AP orders may be inappropriate, such as possible abrupt pitch command.
Are you aware of such specific concern among the 13 events ?
Why that AD so late (DEC 2010) when the 13 events were already known for a while ?
Any possibility for
another ... event to justify the making of such AD ?
Originally Posted by 'PJ2"
I'm not sure what to make of "c", (in the sense that I would have expected not a pitch angle protection active, but an AoA protection active input.
I don't have an answer to that question, but that reminds me the
'Anti pitch-up compensation' which was partially responsible of the QF72 upset.
Who was aware of that 'compensation' ... before it was mentionned in the ATSB report ?
I had personaly never seen anything on it in any FCOM or other VACBI.
Just to say that there is so much unknown or/and untold on those airplanes ...