Hi Maui
My logic may be out but isn't it the other way around
The question should be:
Where is the AFAP taking us, as it is a reaction to there demands that has created this hiatus.
I feel a special meeting of the AFAP is in order to discuss there position.
Threatening legal action against our fund unless they complied with there demands, demands that could have tied up the fund for years in potential litigation.
I feel that the positions taken by both parties on the advice of there legal advisers is the route cause of this. One being from the Law firm that set the rules in place to the agreement of both parties, the other an independent, and just perhaps not fully conversant with the rules in place or not briefed to the depth required to give proper advice reference the rules
as you say we need info
Remember its your AFAP