The conflict and polarisation of both parties in this "dispute" is the single biggest and most compelling reason for a NO vote.
NO does not mean the rule changes will never be implemented, it simply allows time for the two groups to sit down and discuss all the issues on the table. If the changes are genuinely in the best interest of the members the delay will give ample time for the MBF trustees to provide the detail and reason behind the changes. The members will then be far better placed to to make a valued judgement.
Rushing this through and voting YES now, without all the details, is a huge risk.