As someone who is a member of both, but knows no one in this I'm not sure who is covering up here (that is one thing that is happening here, by who I'm not sure).
But the idea of having a single yes or no vote on something that covers 4 topics IS WRONG! That is the sort of thing that makes me very wary. Its the sort of tactic used by third world countries (or Australian governments now it seems).
This needs to be discussed at an AGM (and it seems now dummies have been spat over this as well) and votes on individual issues.
If the Fund has an issue fine..... but be mature and deal with it in an adult way and not try and back door with a rushed vote on numerous issues. That has set my master caution light on over this shambles. And tell us how much it will cost as well. If the fund doesn't know this well......