My posting was not taking sides
Okay.
It is possible that electrical bonding is superior in Boeings.
This statement is clearly contradicting your earlier statement. What makes you say that electrical bonding is superior in Boeings ? Can you conclusively link any Airbus crashes to inferior electrical bonding ? As I mentioned earlier, B777 structural composite make up is similar to the A330s. Does that mean that CAA should run an investigation against Boeing ? FYI, almost all aircrafts designed in the 80s and 90s have some amount of composites in them irregardless of manufacturer.
I consider the Airbus range to be a fine product, but to bury your head in the sand is not good airmanship.
And for you to make that statement after declaring impartiality and pinpoint Airbus is clearly both biased and hypocritical of you.
When any aircraft is rolled out, the major aviation authorities such as FAA and EASA would conduct numerous amount of tests to validate its airworthiness. I'm pretty sure that electrical conductivity and lightning tests is among them. If there were any problems, the a/c would not be allowed to fly. If there were fundamental design flaws discovered in the course of AF447 investigation, or any other for that matter, that needs immediate attention, they will be grounded till they are fixed.( E.g: DC 10)
If you concerned about safety, please do so without double standards.