|
Onlywatching, I disagree with your statement: 'One is still better than none, which is a quite possible alternative at the moment!'
One carrier is worse than none. It gives the impression of having a capability (to politicians and the public) without any guarantee that the capability could actually be delivered when needed. The expense of building and supporting it in service would strip resources from many more useful and versatile capabilties.
One carrier = one crock.
|