tocamak, as far as i'm concerned, the ballot IS done in a proper manner.
By email with personal addresses and with NO independent body such as the CAC or Electoral Reform Society NOT scrutinising. hmm The people involved were actively badgering people for a response. How will that go down in a CAC hearing? Good luck with the independent scrutiniser as my mate down the pub said he would sign off on it for a fiver.
“As far as you are concerned”, that’s ok though because you speak for everyone???
It's a rather arrogant stance is it not?
That’s not a ballot, that is out and out intimidation and I think many people realise that. Kim Jong-il will be proud young one.
False statements and then intimidatory action of colleagues. The CAC will have a say about it i'm sure but what about your colleagues? It's ok though as you obviously don't give a stuff about them.. I just hope for the person who emailed and their family’s sake that a colleague doesn't pursue legal action against such preposterous outrages.
I haven't responded ATS to your post above because I have been patiently waiting for you to answer tocamak's question. There seems for some bizarre reason that you are unwilling or unable to answer the question directly? Why?
It's a ballot of WORKERS not MEMBERS. Hence the said person contacted everyone who are all WORKERS in the base. Your arguing against yourself now..