More specifically does the document include the type of training tasking that is being suggested as useful (i.e. upset training, loss of major subsystems, etc)
I haven't read the document but it is my experience that unusual attitude recovery training is not seriously acknowledged at management levels that are responsible for simulator syllabus design. All too often, it is seen as a "fun-hack - flick -zoom," exercise to be slipped in towards the end of a final recurrent sim session and that a pilot cannot be failed if he stuffs up a fun exercise.
Having observed a significant proportion of crashes in the simulator following incorrect recovery from an unusual attitude or jet upset, I can readily understand why Loss of Control has superseded CFIT as the leading cause of hull losses. Yet, even that statistic fails to convince those that make the rules to direct priority to jet upset training in simulators.