Anotherthing
So the Union does not understand that people will vote 'NO' if they believe that is in the best interests for the pension fund.
Can someone please explain why voting No is in the best interest of the fund?
And I don't mean individuals benefits, but the fund as a whole?
Kinglouis
and stilldarkandhungry, if you want more constructive attitudes, can you pass that on to management as they are clearly taking the piss out of us, phil james is proving this (see above)
Just because I may be contemplating a Yes vote doesn't mean I'm in direct contact with management by the way.
