PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Part M

vee-tail-1 · 19th August 2008, 01:41

Go to the EASA website and you will get all you need from the horses mouth.

See "Guidance for Owners of Private Aircraft of 2730 kgs MTOM & Below"

Rulemaking | Rulemaking archives

Scroll down to: COMMENT RESPONSE DOCUMENT (CRT) ARCHIVES
then click on CRD 2007-08 Go to page 357 of 457

There you will see in print along with references to part M that:
(a) THE OWNER is responsible for the continued airworthiness of his aircraft. (c) NO NEED TO CONTRACT WITH A CAMO. The OWNER may manage the continuing airworthiness of his aircraft under his own responsibility. And much more of interest.

Not sure how the French will react to part M as it is very similar to their present system. The GSAC recently published a guide for small maintenance workshops wishing to implement part M sub parts F,G,&I . It showed how a CAMO would function in practice and seems to indicate that one person could be the CAMO and another the maintenance organisation.
Important to realise that EASA requires the administration of continuing airworthiness (the paperwork) to be quite separate from the maintenance (nuts & bolts & servicing) of the aircraft.

19th August 2008, 01:41	#12 (permalink)
vee-tail-1 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Pembrokeshire UK Posts: 123	Go to the EASA website and you will get all you need from the horses mouth. See "Guidance for Owners of Private Aircraft of 2730 kgs MTOM & Below" Rulemaking \| Rulemaking archives Scroll down to: COMMENT RESPONSE DOCUMENT (CRT) ARCHIVES then click on CRD 2007-08 Go to page 357 of 457 There you will see in print along with references to part M that: (a) THE OWNER is responsible for the continued airworthiness of his aircraft. (c) NO NEED TO CONTRACT WITH A CAMO. The OWNER may manage the continuing airworthiness of his aircraft under his own responsibility. And much more of interest. Not sure how the French will react to part M as it is very similar to their present system. The GSAC recently published a guide for small maintenance workshops wishing to implement part M sub parts F,G,&I . It showed how a CAMO would function in practice and seems to indicate that one person could be the CAMO and another the maintenance organisation. Important to realise that EASA requires the administration of continuing airworthiness (the paperwork) to be quite separate from the maintenance (nuts & bolts & servicing) of the aircraft. Last edited by vee-tail-1 : 19th August 2008 at 02:10.