PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post

CL300 · 4th July 2008, 08:20

Cannes has issues to come in, Nice has problems with ramp space. see latest Notam.

Both are now coordinated airports; Environmental is tight in Cannes, and noise monitoring plus tracks compliance +Cohor might lead to a 7500€ fine per non-compliant flight...

Landmark , even with their own bowser would not be able to refuel on busy week end since their fuel will be held for scheduled airline by local law on ad-hoc basis.

Your boss is better off in Cannes with a LR45 than Nice, for a lot of reasons.

131.575 is manned during ops hours from a portacabin on top of the terminal.

Remember in Cannes whatever in visual approach or not , flight tracks have to be followed and clean configuration to be maintained up to Pibon.

Slot is manadatory, fines will be levied (7500 €)

have a good one

additionnal comments :

Airport Slot in Cannes: (not ppr; ppr is for accessing a restricted airport, this is not the case, if you come VFR, you can get in) There is a lot of availibility, coordination is implemented to prevent regulation (ATC slots); it is not more a burden than before, the ATC capacity is 4 arrival per hour (15 min pitch) and 6 departure per hour(10 min pitch) to a maximum of 9 movement sliding per hour. If more aircrafts are showing up (ATC delay enroute or else ---> Holding at MUS or NERAS) During the summer, people with no prior cohor authorisation are most likely to be diverted to Marseille, Avignon or Lyon ENROUTE by the UIR sector, the FPL will be killed not only when filed, but up to start up... Do you really want to have the customer in the plane , call for start to discover that you do not have an authorization ? ( same for Nice, special task force in place since yesterday)
If you operate outside your authorization time, ie FPL filed at a differrent time then the authorization ; at the end of IATA season S08, data will be crunched and 7500€ will be asked , PER flight !...

Noise monitoring campaign is on the go, DO NOT USE your reverses; MAINTAIN clean configuration to PIBON, FOLLOW the tracks even on a VISUAL approach... Money is scarce and now they have a law they can apply; remember they are going private and now they are accounted for the deviations....

4th July 2008, 08:20	#6 (permalink)
CL300 Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Far away from LA Age: 89 Posts: 424	Cannes has issues to come in, Nice has problems with ramp space. see latest Notam. Both are now coordinated airports; Environmental is tight in Cannes, and noise monitoring plus tracks compliance +Cohor might lead to a 7500€ fine per non-compliant flight... Landmark , even with their own bowser would not be able to refuel on busy week end since their fuel will be held for scheduled airline by local law on ad-hoc basis. Your boss is better off in Cannes with a LR45 than Nice, for a lot of reasons. 131.575 is manned during ops hours from a portacabin on top of the terminal. Remember in Cannes whatever in visual approach or not , flight tracks have to be followed and clean configuration to be maintained up to Pibon. Slot is manadatory, fines will be levied (7500 €) have a good one additionnal comments : Airport Slot in Cannes: (not ppr; ppr is for accessing a restricted airport, this is not the case, if you come VFR, you can get in) There is a lot of availibility, coordination is implemented to prevent regulation (ATC slots); it is not more a burden than before, the ATC capacity is 4 arrival per hour (15 min pitch) and 6 departure per hour(10 min pitch) to a maximum of 9 movement sliding per hour. If more aircrafts are showing up (ATC delay enroute or else ---> Holding at MUS or NERAS) During the summer, people with no prior cohor authorisation are most likely to be diverted to Marseille, Avignon or Lyon ENROUTE by the UIR sector, the FPL will be killed not only when filed, but up to start up... Do you really want to have the customer in the plane , call for start to discover that you do not have an authorization ? ( same for Nice, special task force in place since yesterday) If you operate outside your authorization time, ie FPL filed at a differrent time then the authorization ; at the end of IATA season S08, data will be crunched and 7500€ will be asked , PER flight !... Noise monitoring campaign is on the go, DO NOT USE your reverses; MAINTAIN clean configuration to PIBON, FOLLOW the tracks even on a VISUAL approach... Money is scarce and now they have a law they can apply; remember they are going private and now they are accounted for the deviations.... Last edited by CL300 : 4th July 2008 at 10:32. Reason: Adding informations