clapton
The objective answer to the question (given your view) would have been: If the assumption was correct, the answer would be two. However, the assumption is not correct, so the answer is one.
If you could just pull back from this a little and take a deep breath, you wouldn’t need to make personal attacks on me to make your point.
I’ve tried to explain that a conflict of interest is not a criticism of a lawyer’s ethics, integrity or professionalism, but you appear to have taken it that way.
Try not to.