PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post

Creampuff · 12th June 2008, 01:14

Two points, J

First, for those who were paying attention, the reason for the 2003 cut-off for the inquiry is obvious: that was the year the CASA Board was abolished, and the current government was elected with a policy of re-establishing the CASA Board. So, the current government needs an inquiry to prove that things got worse, not better, when the CASA Board was abolished, so as to retrospectively justify a decision that's already been made.

Secondly, you're about as sharp as a bowling ball.

12th June 2008, 01:14	#72 (permalink)
Creampuff Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Salt Lake City Utah Posts: 1,000	Two points, J First, for those who were paying attention, the reason for the 2003 cut-off for the inquiry is obvious: that was the year the CASA Board was abolished, and the current government was elected with a policy of re-establishing the CASA Board. So, the current government needs an inquiry to prove that things got worse, not better, when the CASA Board was abolished, so as to retrospectively justify a decision that's already been made. Secondly, you're about as sharp as a bowling ball.