Atreyu, broadreach, thnx for your ideas. Regarding the failure rate of the electric drive system, I guess a suitable MTBF could be engineered in. If it is not functioning a (slow) push back on one drive should be possible, or a conventional tug could do the job. It's not a no go item.
Still if it works 99.x % of the time it means a dramatic reduction of airport noise & air contamination. It might pursuade airport authorities to allow more flights or at early/late hours or alternative runways. For e.g charter and low cost airlines this would add value compared to existing types.
Of course a lighter simplified ATR / BAE 146 type of gear could be specified. I included it in the sketch.
Changes compared to earlier sketch:
- Additional escape window (required)
- Alternative simplified main landing gear
- Wing - engine pylon fairing
- Belly access doors
It would be nice to have feedback from folks from fleet management departments / OEMS. What would be the best way to get their opinions?