PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - First the Vulcan, but what next?
View Single Post
Old 18th October 2007 | 14:56
  #19 (permalink)  
GeeRam
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,140
Likes: 331
From: Royal Berkshire
Originally Posted by FATTER GATOR
I thougth the Lightning wasn't allowed by the CAA because there is no available manufacturer support. Maybe someone can fill me in on that one. We have several that are a 'sticks-pull' away from being airborne.
See my post#12 above.

Although 2 x F.6's and a T.5 are a sticks-pull away in that they 'work' as fast taxi airframes, they havebeen maintained IIRC with that purpose, so the paperwork as needed by the CAA as 'flyers' isn't there.
Effectively they would have to undergo the same as XH558 with lifed papertrail components be refitted.........and there's your problem.

The AALO at Stennis may get the ex-Boscombe T.5 in the air one day, but otherwise, Thunder City in SA will likely remain the only place you'll see a flying Lightning.
On that I see IB is getting his hand in with some more Lightning flying again recently out there, to be seen on a BBC documentary about the earth this month sometime.
GeeRam is offline  
Reply